original description
Curtis, J. (1845). Observations on the natural history and economy of the insects called wireworms, etc. Journal of the Royal Agricultural Society of England, 5(1): 180-237
page(s): 229; note: Julus latistriatus [details]
additional source
Read, H. J.; Enghoff, H. (2023). On the species names of some British millipedes. <em>Bulletin of the British Myriapod and Isopod Group.</em> 35: 43-44., available online at https://bmig.org.uk/sites/default/files/bulletin/BullBMIG35-2023p43-44_Read-Enghoff_millipede-names.pdf
page(s): 43; note: In the original description by Curtis in 1845, the first mention of the species is given as Julus
latistriatus, although subsequent mentions in the same paper use the spelling latestriatus. [details]
From editor or global species database
Spelling It is currently unclear whether C. latistriatus (Curtis, 1845) or C. latestriatus (Curtis, 1845) is the valid spelling. The species was mentioned first in the publication of Curtis 1845 as latistriatus but later in the text as latestriatus. C. latestriatus was used by hundreds of authors in undreds of publications as C. latestriatus but only in very few publications as latistriatus. According to Read & Enghoff (2023) it should be latistriatus (Principle of priority, Article 23 ICZN) but this case meets also the criteria of Principle of stability (Article 82.1. ICZN). Until this case is submitted and decided by the International Commission on Zoological Nomenclature, C. latestriatus is retained here in MilliBase to avoid confusion. [details]