MilliBase

| | | | | | | |

MilliBase name details

Akreiodesmus Carl, 1932

AphiaID

893322 (urn:lsid:marinespecies.org:taxname:893322)

Classification

Status

unaccepted (unavailable: invalidly proposed without a type species)

Accepted Name

Akreiodesmus Attems, 1940

Rank

Genus

Parent

Pyrgodesmidae Silvestri, 1896

Direct children (2)

Ordering

Alphabetically
By status

Children Display

direct main ranks all

Species Akreiodesmus minutus Carl, 1932 [Akreiodesmus Carl, 1932] accepted as Akreiodesmus minutus Carl, 1932
Species Akreiodesmus simulans Carl, 1932 [Akreiodesmus Carl, 1932] accepted as Akreiodesmus simulans Carl, 1932

Environment

~~marine~~, ~~brackish~~, ~~fresh~~, terrestrial

Original description

Carl, J. (1932). Zoologische Forschungen in Süd-Indien (Winter 1926/27). Diplopoden aus Süd-Indien und Ceylon. 1. Teil. Polydesmoidea. Revue suisse de zoologie, 39(17): 411-529. Genève
page(s): 505 [details]

Taxonomic citation

Sierwald, P.; Decker, P.; Spelda, J. (2024). MilliBase. Akreiodesmus Carl, 1932. Accessed at: https://www.millibase.org/aphia.php?p=taxdetails&id=893322 on 2024-12-14

Taxonomic edit history

Date

action

2016-12-21 12:20:58Z

created

Sierwald, Petra

[taxonomic tree]

Sources (3)

original description Carl, J. (1932). Zoologische Forschungen in Süd-Indien (Winter 1926/27). Diplopoden aus Süd-Indien und Ceylon. 1. Teil. Polydesmoidea. Revue suisse de zoologie, 39(17): 411-529. Genève
page(s): 505 [details]

basis of record Jeekel, C. A. W. (1971). Nomenclator generum et familiarum Diplopodorum: A list of the genus and family-group names in the Class Diplopoda from the 10th edition of Linnaeus, 1758, to the end of 1957. Monografieen van de Nederlandse Entomologische Vereniging, 5: 1-412. Amsterdam, available online at https://nev.nl/wp-content/uploads/2020/11/Mono-05-Jeekel-1970-OCR.pdf
page(s): 310 [details]

additional source Hoffman, R. L. (1980). Classification of the Diplopoda. 1-237. Genève.
page(s): 179; note: Akreiodesmus Attems, 1940 (syn. [Akreiodesmus Carl, 1932, was invalidly proposed without type species]) [details]