MilliBase
Traits taxon details
Gigantorhacus pfeifferae (Humbert & Saussure, 1869)
1451492 (urn:lsid:marinespecies.org:taxname:1451492)
accepted
Species
(of ) Humbert, A.; Saussure, H. L. F. de. (1869). Description de divers Myriapodes du Musée de Vienne. <em>Verhandlungen der Kaiserlich-Königlichen Zoologisch-Botanischen Gesellschaft in Wien.</em> 19: 669-692. Wien., available online at https://biodiversitylibrary.org/page/30240388
page(s): 680 [details]
page(s): 680 [details]
Sierwald, P.; Decker, P.; Spelda, J. (2024). MilliBase. Gigantorhacus pfeifferae (Humbert & Saussure, 1869). Accessed through: Marine Species Traits editorial board (2024) Marine Species Traits at: https://www.marinespecies.org/traits/aphia.php?p=taxdetails&id=1451492 on 2025-04-04
Marine Species Traits editorial board (2025). Marine Species Traits. Gigantorhacus pfeifferae (Humbert & Saussure, 1869). Accessed at: https://www.marinespecies.org/traits/aphia.php?p=taxdetails&id=1451492 on 2025-04-04
Date
action
by
original description
(of ) Humbert, A.; Saussure, H. L. F. de. (1869). Description de divers Myriapodes du Musée de Vienne. <em>Verhandlungen der Kaiserlich-Königlichen Zoologisch-Botanischen Gesellschaft in Wien.</em> 19: 669-692. Wien., available online at https://biodiversitylibrary.org/page/30240388
page(s): 680 [details]
new combination reference Jeekel, C. A. W. (2007). An annotated bibliographical catalogue of the Indo-Australian Platyrhacidae (Diplopoda, Polydesmida). <em>Myriapod memoranda.</em> 10: 49-101.
page(s): 56-57; note: The records of this species from so many widely separated localities are quite unrealistic. Supposedly the old type material was mislabelled; the Borneo and Malay material was probably wrong identif...
[details]
page(s): 680 [details]
new combination reference Jeekel, C. A. W. (2007). An annotated bibliographical catalogue of the Indo-Australian Platyrhacidae (Diplopoda, Polydesmida). <em>Myriapod memoranda.</em> 10: 49-101.
page(s): 56-57; note: The records of this species from so many widely separated localities are quite unrealistic. Supposedly the old type material was mislabelled; the Borneo and Malay material was probably wrong identif...
The records of this species from so many widely separated localities
are quite unrealistic. Supposedly the old type material was mislabelled; the
Borneo and Malay material was probably wrong identified. Probably East
Sumatra is the only correct locality.
