original description
(of Schizophyllum moreleti lienharti Brölemann, 1921) Brölemann, H. W. (1921). Description d'une race Française de Schizophyllum moreleti (Lucas) et d'une anomalie d'un male de la race typique. Bulletin de la Société d'histoire naturelle de Toulouse, 49: 182-195. Toulouse
page(s): 182-189, figs. 1-9 [details]
additional source
Brölemann, H. W. (1921). Description d'une race Française de Schizophyllum moreleti (Lucas) et d'une anomalie d'un male de la race typique. Bulletin de la Société d'histoire naturelle de Toulouse, 49: 182-195. Toulouse
page(s): 139 [details]
additional source
Kime, R. D.; Enghoff, H. (2017). Atlas of European millipedes 2: Order Julida (Class Diplopoda). <em>European Journal of Taxonomy.</em> 346: 1–299., available online at https://doi.org/10.5852/ejt.2017.346
page(s): 139-140; note: Very similar to, and possibly a synonym of O. bipartitus (N. Akkari in litt.). [details]
status source
Reip, H. S.; Voigtländer, K. (2024). Millipedes (Diplopoda) of the Euskal Herria / Basque Region in Northern España/Spain – Results of an international field trip in 2009. <em>Schubartiana.</em> 11: 27-70., available online at https://www.schubartiana.de/issues/pdf/vol11/reip-2024-Diplopoda_Basque_Region_Spain_field_trip_2009.pdf
page(s): 59-60; note:
The complex paracoxite of our specimens (drawn in fig. 5D in AKKARI & ENGHOFF 2017) fits
well with the description and drawing by BRÖLEMANN (1921: 183-185, figs 3, 5). AKKARI & ENGHOFF (2017: 8-9) s...
The complex paracoxite of our specimens (drawn in fig. 5D in AKKARI & ENGHOFF 2017) fits
well with the description and drawing by BRÖLEMANN (1921: 183-185, figs 3, 5). AKKARI & ENGHOFF (2017: 8-9) see this species as a synonym of O. bipartitus (Verhoeff, 1910). Two arguments speak against this synonymisation: Firstly, the paracoxite is much more complex than that of O. bipartitus drawn by V ERHOEFF (1910: fig. 14), secondly, AKKARI & ENGHOFF (2017) found relatively constant morphs in the species group O. bipartitus (moreleti-karschi-lienharti-bipartitus) and they themselves suggested morphological / molecular analyses for delineating this species group. Until further clarification, we keep O. lienharti as a distinct species.
[details]
From editor or global species database