Silvestri, F. (1897). Neue Diplopoden. <em>Abhandlungen und Berichte des Königl. Zoologischen und Anthropologisch-Ethnographischen Museums zu Dresden.</em> 6(9): 1-23. Dresden. page(s): 5 [details]
original descriptionSilvestri, F. (1897). Neue Diplopoden. <em>Abhandlungen und Berichte des Königl. Zoologischen und Anthropologisch-Ethnographischen Museums zu Dresden.</em> 6(9): 1-23. Dresden. page(s): 5 [details]
additional sourceAttems, C. M. T. Graf von. (1914). Die indo-australischen Myriopoden. <em>Archiv für Naturgeschichte.</em> 80A(4): 1-398. Berlin., available online athttps://www.biodiversitylibrary.org/page/13260451 page(s): 308 [details]
source of synonymyMarek, P. E.; Bond, J. E.; Sierwald, P. (2003). Rhinocricidae systematics II: a species catalog of the Rhinocricidae (Diplopoda: Spirobolida) with synonymies. Zootaxa, 308: 1-108. Auckland page(s): 45 [details]
new combination referenceChamberlin, R. V. (1920). The Myriopoda of the Australian Region. <em>Bulletin of the Museum of Comparative Zoology.</em> 64(1): 1-269., available online athttps://biodiversitylibrary.org/page/30743608 page(s): 176; note: Proporobolus bicornis [details]
status sourceJeekel, C. A. W. (2001). A bibliographic catalogue of the Spirobolida of the Oriental and Australian regions (Diplopoda). Myriapod memoranda, 4: 5-104. Oisterwijk page(s): 39; note: RHINOCRICIDAE of uncertain generic position. The posterior gonopod of this species as illustrated by
Silvestri somewhat suggests an American or perhaps an Australian
rhinocricid. Considering what is...
RHINOCRICIDAE of uncertain generic position. The posterior gonopod of this species as illustrated by
Silvestri somewhat suggests an American or perhaps an Australian
rhinocricid. Considering what is known of the Rhinocricidae
occurring on the Fiji Islands, they all belong to the genus
Dinelllatocricus in the sense of this catalogue, and not to Proporobolus.
Maybe the locality label of the material was incorrect.