MilliBase

| | | | | | | |

MilliBase name details

Haplorhacus Attems, 1914

AphiaID

891689 (urn:lsid:marinespecies.org:taxname:891689)

Classification

Status

uncertain

Rank

Genus

Typetaxon

Platyrrhacus doryphorus Attems, 1899 accepted as Haplorhacus doryphorus (Attems, 1899) (type by subsequent designation)

Parent

Platyrhacinae Pocock, 1895

Direct children (1)

Ordering

Alphabetically
By status

Children Display

direct main ranks all

Species Haplorhacus doryphorus (Attems, 1899) (uncertain)

Environment

~~marine~~, ~~brackish~~, ~~fresh~~, terrestrial

Grammatical gender

masculine

Original description

Attems, C. M. T. Graf von. (1914). Die indo-australischen Myriopoden. Archiv für Naturgeschichte. 80A(4): 1-398. Berlin., available online at https://www.biodiversitylibrary.org/page/13260451
page(s): 273 [details]

Taxonomic citation

Sierwald, P.; Decker, P.; Spelda, J. (2024). MilliBase. Haplorhacus Attems, 1914. Accessed at: https://www.millibase.org/aphia.php?p=taxdetails&id=891689 on 2024-09-10

Taxonomic edit history

Date

action

2016-12-20 08:40:13Z

created

Sierwald, Petra

2017-09-01 12:54:16Z

changed

Spelda, Jörg

2021-12-13 11:01:46Z

changed

Decker, Peter

[taxonomic tree]

Sources (2)

original description Attems, C. M. T. Graf von. (1914). Die indo-australischen Myriopoden. Archiv für Naturgeschichte. 80A(4): 1-398. Berlin., available online at https://www.biodiversitylibrary.org/page/13260451
page(s): 273 [details]

status source Jeekel, C. A. W. (2007). An annotated bibliographical catalogue of the Indo-Australian Platyrhacidae (Diplopoda, Polydesmida). Myriapod memoranda. 10: 49-101.
page(s): 87; note: Genera incertae sedis. Note: The type-species is not Platyrhacus haplopus as erroneously stated in some publications. According to Hoffman the type material of this species could not be found. As the ...

Genera incertae sedis. Note: The type-species is not Platyrhacus haplopus as erroneously stated in some publications. According to Hoffman the type material of this species could not be found. As the gonopods were never illustrated and only briefly described the identity of the genus and its type is obscure.

[details]