MilliBase

Intro | Search taxa | Taxon tree | Distribution | Specimens | Sources | Statistics | Editors | Log in

MilliBase name details

Tylobolus viduus Chamberlin, 1940

941157  (urn:lsid:marinespecies.org:taxname:941157)

uncertain > taxon inquirendum
Species
marine, brackish, fresh, terrestrial
Chamberlin, R. V. (1940). Four new Western millipeds. J. Ent. Zool. Claremont Cal., 32(4): 81-83
page(s): 82 [details] 
Type locality contained in California  
type locality contained in California [details]
Status Hoffman 1999 states: "The missing type specimen was collected at the same time and same place by the same collector as the...  
Status Hoffman 1999 states: "The missing type specimen was collected at the same time and same place by the same collector as the type of Tylobolus monachus, strong circumstantial evidence that both names are based on the same species. Morever, the liklihood also exists that the "missing" type of viduus is actually the type of monachus. An identical parallel occurs in the case of Euzonium crucis and Hypozonium arnaudi (q.v. sub Octoglena bivirgata)." [details]
Sierwald, P.; Decker, P.; Spelda, J. (2024). MilliBase. Tylobolus viduus Chamberlin, 1940. Accessed at: https://www.millibase.org/aphia.php?p=taxdetails&id=941157 on 2025-01-14
Date
action
by
2017-01-19 09:46:04Z
created
2024-04-07 18:07:37Z
changed

original description Chamberlin, R. V. (1940). Four new Western millipeds. J. Ent. Zool. Claremont Cal., 32(4): 81-83
page(s): 82 [details] 

additional source Keeton, W. T. (1960). A taxonomic study of the milliped family Spirobolidae (Diplopoda: Spirobolida). Memoirs of the American Entomological Society, 17: 1-146. Philadelphia
page(s): 134 [details] 

additional source Hoffman, R. L. (1999). Checklist of the millipedes of North and Middle America. <em>Virginia Museum of Natural History, special publication.</em> 8: 1-584.
page(s): 47; note: "The missing type specimen was collected at the same time and same place by the same collector as the type of Tylobolus monachus, strong circumstantial evidence that both names are based on the same...    
"The missing type specimen was collected at the same time and same place by the same collector as the type of Tylobolus monachus, strong circumstantial evidence that both names are based on the same species. Morever, the liklihood also exists that the "missing" type of viduus is actually the type of monachus. An identical parallel occurs in the case of Euzonium crucis and Hypozonium arnaudi (q.v. sub Octoglena bivirgata)."
[details] 
 
 Present  Inaccurate  Introduced: alien  Containing type locality 
   

From editor or global species database
Status Hoffman 1999 states: "The missing type specimen was collected at the same time and same place by the same collector as the type of Tylobolus monachus, strong circumstantial evidence that both names are based on the same species. Morever, the liklihood also exists that the "missing" type of viduus is actually the type of monachus. An identical parallel occurs in the case of Euzonium crucis and Hypozonium arnaudi (q.v. sub Octoglena bivirgata)." [details]
This service is powered by LifeWatch Belgium
Learn more»
Website and databases developed and hosted by VLIZ · Page generated 2025-01-22 · contact: Petra Sierwald